引用本文
  •    [点击复制]
  •    [点击复制]
【打印本页】【下载PDF全文】 查看/发表评论下载PDF阅读器关闭

←前一篇|后一篇→

过刊浏览    高级检索

本文已被:浏览次   下载 本文二维码信息
码上扫一扫!
主观预备合并诉讼的适用检视与借鉴
陈元庆
0
(西南政法大学 阜阳师范大学)
摘要:
日韩及我国台湾地区就主观预备合并诉讼已有丰富的适用实践。通过对其适用的典型案例所反映出的颇具争议的问题,如适用价值、被告地位不安定、诉讼系属及当事人诉讼地位等问题进行充分理论检视后,可发现,相关理论已能较好地消解学界对被告地位不安定等问题的疑虑,虽然在复杂上诉审情形下被告诉讼地位及其裁判问题还有较大争议,但这并不足以否认该制度设立趣旨。这些实践经验总结及理论争鸣,为我国大陆地区将来构建主观预备合并诉讼提供了有益经验借鉴。
关键词:  主观预备合并诉讼  适用检视  备位被告不安定  诉讼系属  诉讼地位
DOI:
基金项目:教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目“民事争点简化协议效力机制研究——以实现庭审实质化为视角”(17YJC820003);安徽省高校省级质量工程项目“民商法系列课程团队”(2017jxtd026)与Mooc示范项目:“教师教育专题”(2018Mooc496)
Application Evaluation of the Subjective Preliminary Combination of Litigation and Its Reference Function
CHEN Yuanqing
(Southwest University of Political Science and Law,Fuyang Normal University)
Abstract:
Japan, South Korea and the Taiwan region of China have made rich practice in applying the subjective preliminary combination of litigation. A thorough theoretical evaluation of the controversial issues which emerge in some typical cases to which it applies, such as application value, defendant’s unstable status, action dependence and parties’ litigant status, reveals that relevant theories have been used to resolve the doubts of academic circle about some issues like defendant’s unstable status. Although there is still a lot of controversy over the status of the accused and its adjudication under the complicated appeal trial situation, this is not enough to deny the significance of the enactment of the law. Such practice summarization and theoretical argument might provide useful experience for the future construction of subjective preliminary combination of litigation in mainland China.
Key words:  subjective preliminary combination of litigation  application evaluation  defendant’s unstable status  action dependence  litigation status

用微信扫一扫

用微信扫一扫